Synthetic Hernia Mesh Product Recall

What to know about synthetic hernia mesh product recalls and how to get legal help

Learn more

$19.9 Million Unsafe Drug Settlement
$6.2 Million Worksite Injury Verdict
$3.75 Million Multi Vehicle Accident Settlement
$3+ Million Mesothelioma from Asbestos Settlement
$2.4 Million Wrongful Death Settlement
$1.6 Million Wrongful Death Settlement
Request a Free Consultation

Lawyers Focused on Your Recovery

Thousands of Successful Cases in State and Federal Court

Expertise in Many Different Personal Injury Case Areas

Request a free consult

### What to know about the synthetic hernia mesh product recall Abdominal wall hernias often require surgical correction. A surgeon can typically repair a hernia without the use of a mesh product and/or the surgeon can use a material, such as a biologic mesh, that poses less risks than many synthetic products that are currently on the market. Many of the synthetic hernia mesh products marketed since the year 2005 to the present were rushed to the market using the FDA’s 510k clearance process and were manufactured and marketed with little to no studies as to the safety of the device. Many of these devices have been silently withdrawn from the market or otherwise have been recalled. These problematic hernia mesh devices contain design defects and undisclosed or under-disclosed risks such as: (1) use of “coatings” on the mesh product that cause adverse reactions and infections; (2) excessive mesh and tissue contraction; (3) tendency of the mesh to migrate, shrink, or turn into a hardened ball or mass; and (4) excess foreign body reaction and rejection of the mesh in the body. The most common side effects in patients are infections, intestinal obstructions or adhesions, permanent nerve damage resulting in pain, hernia recurrence, and revision surgery to correct complications and remove or revise the mesh.

### Commonly reported hernia mesh injuries Hernia mesh injuries are not uncommon. Many injuries result in chronic pain and force patients to undergo avoidable and unnecessary surgical procedures. In some cases, hernia mesh injuries can be fatal. **Fistula.** A fistula is an abnormal connection between two parts of the body. In hernia mesh patients, it’s not uncommon for organs to adhere to the intestinal tract. This abnormal connection damages the intestines and can cause waste to leak into the body and bloodstream. Symptoms of a mesh-related fistula include: - Painful bowel movements - Bloody stool - Lower abdominal pain - Red and swollen skin, and - Bulging veins. **Intestinal Obstruction.** Mesh devices can generate a significant amount of scar tissue in the body. Scar tissue can promote dangerous mesh adhesion. In some cases, this adhesion can create partial or complete blockages in the large and small intestines. **Bowel obstruction.** A bowel obstruction can reduce or limit blood flow the organ, which, in turn, causes tissue death. Obstructions can also cause the intestines to leak into the bloodstream, which can lead to life-threatening infections. Symptoms of intestinal obstruction include: - Lower abdominal pain - Cramping - Bloating - Fever - Infection, and - Constipation. **Internal Bleeding.** Internal bleeding is a common and dangerous complication associated with hernia mesh device failure. Bleeding can occur when mesh implants perforate internal organs, adhere to tissue near the site of the hernia, or migrate to a different part of the body. Bleeding can develop gradually over time or occur rapidly. If not treated right away, internal bleeding can be life-threatening. Patients can suffer from shock, tissue death, and loss of consciousness. Symptoms of internal bleeding include: - Shortness of breath - Bruising - Rapid heart rate - Pain in the chest or shoulders - Changes in vision - Numbness or tingling in the extremities - Nausea, and - Vomiting.

### What are the problematic hernia mesh implants? Several hernia mesh implants have been linked to adverse health events. These include, but are not limited to: - Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Mesh - Ethicon Proceed Mesh - Atrium C-Qur Mesh - Atrium ProLite Mesh - Medtronic Versatex Monofilament Mesh - Bard 3DMax Mesh - Bard PerFix Plug - Bard Composix Mesh, and - Covidien Parietex Mesh.

### What Should I Do If My Hernia Mesh Is Recalled? If your mesh is recalled but you aren’t experiencing any problems, then you don’t need to have the mesh removed or take any action. If your mesh is on the recall list and you are suffering complications, the first thing you should do is speak to your doctor. Some complications from recalled mesh can be serious and need to be treated right away. Your doctor can help you figure out if your mesh is causing problems and if you need another surgery.

### Have you developed a complication from a hernia mesh implant? Find out if you qualify for compensation If you have developed an injury from a hernia mesh implant, our lawyers can review your case for free and see if your injury qualifies for compensation. Request a callback below by filling in a few details about your case and an attorney will reach out to you within the hour.

Request a Callback

SEE OUR NOTABLE SETTLEMENTS

See some of our personal injury settlements.

See Injury Settlements Here
Notable Injury Settlements | Green and Schafle

Meet Adam Green

Adam is a founding partner and passionate trial lawyer devoted to nursing home litigation, securities and car accidents

Meet Adam
Adam Green Lawyer | Green and Schafle Phiadelphia

Meet Michael Schafle

Michael is a founding partner and the firm’s defective product and unsafe drug mass tort litigator

Meet Michael
Michael Schafle Lawyer | Green and Schafle Phiadelphia

What Our Clients Say

4.8/5 Based on 95 Google Reviews
for Green & Schafle

Caren Gulledge

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

I cannot recommend this law firm enough! From start to finish, they handled my case with professionalism, knowledge, and genuine care. They kept me informed throughout the entire process, answered all my questions clearly, and made sure I felt confident every step of the way. Their attention to detail and dedication truly made a difference in the outcome of my case. I am beyond grateful for everything my attorney did for me. This was a stressful time in my life, and they made the process so much easier by being patient, understanding, and always available when I needed answers. They truly cared about my situation and worked hard to get the best possible result.If you’re looking for someone who is experienced, responsive, and truly fights for their clients, this is the attorney you want on your side. Five stars all the way!

3 months ago

barry atlas

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

I highly recommend David Carney of Green & Schafle for his outstanding work on my SIRVA vaccine injury case. After suffering a left arm injury that lasted more than four years, I faced a long and complicated settlement process. David was knowledgeable, responsive, and relentless in advocating on my behalf. He clearly understood the medical and legal complexities of SIRVA claims, kept me informed at every stage, and never lost focus on achieving a fair outcome. Thanks to his persistence and expertise, my case was successfully resolved. If you need trusted, experienced representation for a SIRVA or vaccine injury claim, David Carney is an excellent choice. —Barry Atlas

3 months ago

Deanna C

★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆

When I sustained a serious shoulder injury from a tetanus shot, I was made aware of the VICP and retained David Carney to represent me. I expected professionalism, transparency, and ethical advocacy. What I encountered instead was a pattern of deception and obstruction that ultimately forced me to terminate the relationship and file formal misconduct complaints. The problems began early. Mr. Carney submitted my damages demand to the government without informing me or involving me in its contents. When I raised concerns about being excluded from such a consequential filing, he responded with dismissiveness, condescension and accused me of insulting him. He claimed he was "not obligated by law" to inform me of developments in my own case. Rather than address my concerns, he attempted to shift blame onto me for expecting transparency. What followed was far more serious. On July 9, 2025, the Department of Justice submitted a settlement offer in my case. Mr. Carney never told me. More than a month later, on August 11, the very same day he filed a Notice of Impasse with the Court, he told me there were "no updates." I had been deprived of the opportunity to review or respond to a government offer before an impasse was formally declared on my behalf. When I discovered what had happened and terminated his representation, I requested my complete case file. Only after termination did Mr. Carney forward what he described as a new DOJ offer. But the email he sent reflected a later date than the original. When I cross-referenced it with the Court docket, the original confirmed the offer had been transmitted on July 9, weeks earlier. His version had been altered and included commentary urging me not to accept the offer, despite having already declared an impasse without ever disclosing it to me. The obstruction continued after termination. He refused to release my records unless I agreed to speak with him by phone and allowed him to be paid out first, falsely claiming payment was required before my file could be returned and that terminating him would automatically stay my case. I have text messages and voicemails documenting this. My records were only produced after further escalation, well past the point he was ethically obligated to surrender them. I escalated to Adam, the firm's founding partner, hoping for accountability. He minimized my concerns and took no corrective action. Mr. Carney then attempted to contact the Special Master independently after termination, without my authorization. After terminating Mr. Carney, I consulted with multiple attorneys who independently confirmed that my concerns were legitimate and that his conduct was inconsistent with acceptable professional standards. The toll was not only legal. The stress became so severe that I began experiencing debilitating panic attacks requiring medical intervention. I share this so others can make informed decisions. To anyone navigating this process: you are not indentured to your attorney. The VICP is designed so that petitioners control their case, not their counsel. Your name is on those filings, so make sure the content reflects your input and that your attorney is discussing every significant development with you. If you are dismissed or made to feel like the case belongs to your attorney rather than to you, find another one. It is your case. It has always been your case.

3 months ago
×
Green & Schafle Client Feedback ()

Back to top
On This Page ×

What is the VICP? How does the VICP Work? What Vaccines are Covered by the VICP? How to File a Petition? Who Can File a Petition? What are the VICP Petition Steps? Do You Need a Lawyer to File a VICP Petition? What are the VICP Vaccine Injury Severity Requirements? What are the VICP Statute of Limitations? What are Vaccine Injury Settlements and Payouts?
Back to top